CfP: Electoral Competitiveness in Non-Democratic Regimes/28th Convention of GPSA (online) - Deadline: February 28

KE
Kristin Eichhorn
Tue, Feb 16, 2021 11:43 AM

 #Apologies for cross-posting.#

Open panel://Electoral Competitiveness in Non-Democratic Regimes

at the 28th National Convention of the German Political Science
Association (GPSA) (digital event), 14-16 Sept 2021*.*

Panel chairs: Jaroslav Bílek (University of Hradec Králové), Kristin
Eichhorn (Chemnitz university of Technology)**


Panel description:

The conduct of multi-party elections has become standard across
non-democratic regimes after the Cold War. However, the
conceptualization of competitiveness through contestation, which is
standard for democratic regimes, does not travel well across regime
boundaries. In non-democratic regimes, incumbents and dominant parties
have a menu of manipulation on their disposal in order to turn the odds
in their favor. The results are by and large uncontested elections
despite multi-party competition.

The objective of the panel is to make progress in the conceptualization
and effects of competitiveness in non-democratic regimes. We welcome
empirical and theoretical papers that raise (but are not limited to)
questions such as:

  • In which way is competitiveness linked to/differentiated from
    related concepts (e.g. electoral integrity, malpractice, repression)?
  • How do different forms of repression and manipulation affect
    electoral competitiveness?
  • Is electoral fraud resulting from precious contestation or
    determining future contestation?
  • How can we map out and compare the uneven playing field? In which
    way are socio-economic factors, institutional factors and legacies
    linked to electoral competitiveness?
  • How is electoral competitiveness linked to electoral choice or
    participation?
  • Is electoral competitiveness affected by the timing of the elections?
  • How do opposition gains in sub-national elections influence
    electoral competitiveness in national elections?

_
_

Please submit your paper proposals (abstracts with max. 250 words) by
28 February 2021 via the DVPW website and choose P130:

https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=DQSIkWdsW0yxEjajBLZtrQAAAAAAAAAAAAO__f3IvVJUMDJDNEowR0ZKMElMVVFVUDVYMUU5MEZaUy4u
https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=DQSIkWdsW0yxEjajBLZtrQAAAAAAAAAAAAO__f3IvVJUMDJDNEowR0ZKMElMVVFVUDVYMUU5MEZaUy4u

Please don't hesitate to contact us directly in case of questions
concerning the panel!

--
Kristin Eichhorn
Professur Politische Systeme
Philosophische Fakultät

Technische Universität Chemnitz
Thüringer Weg 9 | R. 2/TW9/216 (neu: C34.216)
09126 Chemnitz
Germany

Tel:    +49 371 531-30214
Fax:    +49 371 531-830214

kristin.eichhorn@phil.tu-chemnitz.de
www.tu-chemnitz.de

 #Apologies for cross-posting.# _Open panel:_//*Electoral Competitiveness in Non-Democratic Regimes* at the 28th National Convention of the German Political Science Association (GPSA) (digital event), 14-16 Sept 2021*.* _Panel chairs_: Jaroslav Bílek (University of Hradec Králové), Kristin Eichhorn (Chemnitz university of Technology)** **** _Panel description:_ The conduct of multi-party elections has become standard across non-democratic regimes after the Cold War. However, the conceptualization of competitiveness through contestation, which is standard for democratic regimes, does not travel well across regime boundaries. In non-democratic regimes, incumbents and dominant parties have a menu of manipulation on their disposal in order to turn the odds in their favor. The results are by and large uncontested elections despite multi-party competition. The objective of the panel is to make progress in the conceptualization and effects of competitiveness in non-democratic regimes. We welcome empirical and theoretical papers that raise (but are not limited to) questions such as: * In which way is competitiveness linked to/differentiated from related concepts (e.g. electoral integrity, malpractice, repression)? * How do different forms of repression and manipulation affect electoral competitiveness? * Is electoral fraud resulting from precious contestation or determining future contestation? * How can we map out and compare the uneven playing field? In which way are socio-economic factors, institutional factors and legacies linked to electoral competitiveness? * How is electoral competitiveness linked to electoral choice or participation? * Is electoral competitiveness affected by the timing of the elections? * How do opposition gains in sub-national elections influence electoral competitiveness in national elections? _ _ Please submit your paper proposals (abstracts with *max. 250 words*) by *28 February 2021* via the DVPW website and choose *P130*: https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=DQSIkWdsW0yxEjajBLZtrQAAAAAAAAAAAAO__f3IvVJUMDJDNEowR0ZKMElMVVFVUDVYMUU5MEZaUy4u <https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=DQSIkWdsW0yxEjajBLZtrQAAAAAAAAAAAAO__f3IvVJUMDJDNEowR0ZKMElMVVFVUDVYMUU5MEZaUy4u> Please don't hesitate to contact us directly in case of questions concerning the panel! -- Kristin Eichhorn Professur Politische Systeme Philosophische Fakultät Technische Universität Chemnitz Thüringer Weg 9 | R. 2/TW9/216 (neu: C34.216) 09126 Chemnitz Germany Tel: +49 371 531-30214 Fax: +49 371 531-830214 kristin.eichhorn@phil.tu-chemnitz.de www.tu-chemnitz.de